Re: [PATCH for-next 4/4] RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Remove usage of BIT() from UAPI header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 03:00:34PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:27:28AM -0800, Bryan Tan wrote:
> > BIT() should not be used in the UAPI header. Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan Tan <bryantan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >  include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> IMHO, it should go to -rc.
> Doug, Jason?

I can't decide if any of the -abi.h changes should be for-rc material
or not..

The BIT() issue is being worked around in userspace today, so this
seems even less for-rc'y?

I'm leaning toward 'not' as we can and do cherry pick a for-next
uapi header into rdma-core, so there isn't really an actual reason to
put changes to those headers into for-rc?

Thoughts?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux