On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 03:00:34PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:27:28AM -0800, Bryan Tan wrote: > > BIT() should not be used in the UAPI header. Remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bryan Tan <bryantan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > IMHO, it should go to -rc. > Doug, Jason? I can't decide if any of the -abi.h changes should be for-rc material or not.. The BIT() issue is being worked around in userspace today, so this seems even less for-rc'y? I'm leaning toward 'not' as we can and do cherry pick a for-next uapi header into rdma-core, so there isn't really an actual reason to put changes to those headers into for-rc? Thoughts? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html