Le 13/11/2017 à 12:43, Leon Romanovsky a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:56:19AM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: >> >> Le 13/11/2017 à 11:41, Leon Romanovsky a écrit : >> >>>> I'm OK with keeping just the ML for the moment. If it becomes too much of a mess, I'll come back with my github request (or something else). >>>> How do you suggest flagging me for those patches ? Should we follow the kernel stable process ? >>> I think so, the kernel process works, we just need to adapt it to rdma-core. >>> Regarding the flagging procedure, we can do like Greg and Sasha do. >>> >>> Open email account (e.g. stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx), connect it to /dev/null, >>> so people won't get bounce emails while they sent patches to it, and >>> once a week or two run script [1], which will check master branch and >>> cherry-pick patches with Cc: stable@ in their commit messages. >>> >>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sashal/stable-tools.git/tree/ >> Sounds fine to me. > Need to document that. > BTW: I opened stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx email, if you want I can forward all > emails from that account to you, right now, everything goes to /dev/null. > > Thanks > > Yes you can forward them to me. I need to prepare a patch with Arlin proposal and this stuff too. Thanks Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
