On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:44:51PM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: > > > Le 13/11/2017 à 12:43, Leon Romanovsky a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:56:19AM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: > >> > >> Le 13/11/2017 à 11:41, Leon Romanovsky a écrit : > >> > >>>> I'm OK with keeping just the ML for the moment. If it becomes too much of a mess, I'll come back with my github request (or something else). > >>>> How do you suggest flagging me for those patches ? Should we follow the kernel stable process ? > >>> I think so, the kernel process works, we just need to adapt it to rdma-core. > >>> Regarding the flagging procedure, we can do like Greg and Sasha do. > >>> > >>> Open email account (e.g. stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx), connect it to /dev/null, > >>> so people won't get bounce emails while they sent patches to it, and > >>> once a week or two run script [1], which will check master branch and > >>> cherry-pick patches with Cc: stable@ in their commit messages. > >>> > >>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sashal/stable-tools.git/tree/ > >> Sounds fine to me. > > Need to document that. > > BTW: I opened stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx email, if you want I can forward all > > emails from that account to you, right now, everything goes to /dev/null. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Yes you can forward them to me. Done, it will take a couple of hours till it will propagate. Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
