On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:27:56AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 06:21:47PM +0000, Kalderon, Michal wrote: > > > I'd like to here if anyone has any objects / concerns on the matter > > in general, and if there is a consensus about the need and whether > > this is something the rdma-core maintainers would be willing to > > provide. > > Previous discussions on this topic concluded that if someone wishes to > maintain a stable branch scheme then we'd make space for that (eg a > github branch or whatever). > > I don't think the existing maintainers are interested in directly > working on this project, so there is room for a new volunteer! The offline discussion was with Vlad. This is the quote of my latest response to him: "There is a need to post request to the mailing list with description of why do you need it and the volunteer name to manage it. It should come with file in Documentation with explanation how such stable branches are managed, for how long, if releases are going to be done and then, ..." Thanks > > Jason
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
