Re: Is ib_mtu iboe_get_mtu() slightly off?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:48:01AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 10/9/2017 4:47 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
> > Sorry for not ACKing that I was doing it last week.
> > If possible, please pick the one that Leon is sending because
> > instead of doing calculation in half comment based and half defined based code,
> > my patch defines all necessary header sizes in calculation, little clean way.
>
> In this instance we are lucky that 0day testing was being slow yesterday
> or else this would already be pushed to k.o.  Since it's not, I can drop
> my patch and take yours.

Did you post your patch for review and gave enough time to participants
to provide the feedback, before pushing it to your k.o.?

Thanks

>
>
> --
> Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     GPG Key ID: B826A3330E572FDD
>     Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
>



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux