RE: Is ib_mtu iboe_get_mtu() slightly off?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amrani, Ram [mailto:Ram.Amrani@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 5:30 AM
> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Doug Ledford
> <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Roland Dreier
> <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Is ib_mtu iboe_get_mtu() slightly off?
> 
> >     Fixes: 3c86aa70bf67 ("RDMA/cm: Add RDMA CM support for IBoE devices")
> >     Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi Parav, All,
> Shouldn't the overhead calculation take into account RoCEv2 too, i.e. include
> the UDP header length?
> 
Yes. I will roll v1 with inclusion of UDP header as well.
Now that we have RoCEv2 GIDs as default, it make sense to always include UDP header in calculation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux