> -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledford@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 9:48 AM > To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky > <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Is ib_mtu iboe_get_mtu() slightly off? > > On 10/9/2017 4:47 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > Sorry for not ACKing that I was doing it last week. > > If possible, please pick the one that Leon is sending because instead > > of doing calculation in half comment based and half defined based > > code, my patch defines all necessary header sizes in calculation, little clean > way. > > In this instance we are lucky that 0day testing was being slow yesterday or else > this would already be pushed to k.o. Since it's not, I can drop my patch and take > yours. Thanks. Leon will send v1 where UDP header would be covered too. ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
