> >> It shouldn't be too hard to automatically extract one of the in-tree provider > >> and try to compile it as an out-of-tree. > >> And this way it's always up-to-date for testing. > >> > > That's a good idea. We could also have a simple "noop" type provider that at > least registers with the core but never claims any devices. This would at least verify > the build/install, and provider-load by libibverbs. > > > > Steve. > > > > noop is good for testing. A true provider would make sure we haven't missed any > headers. Agreed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
