On Tue, 1 Aug 2017, Chien Tin Tung wrote: > Why do I need to explain the original patch? It was accepted many kernels > ago. Your questions on the original were based on false assumptions and > facts which I've proven over and over. You are right in that I do > not want to revisit those either. There is a patch that can solve > the problem you are facing but yet you insist on the revert. This is > very puzzling to me. You simply refuse to move this forward. That > is your choice but revert is a no go for me. Ok this is pretty confusing to someone not involved in the prior discussions. Could both of your stop attacking each other and start talking about the technical issues? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
