On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:13:15AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Thanks, that is another option. With that, we will be freeing the > > rdma_netdev from a function pointer call that belongs to that rdma_netdev. > > Is that ok? (Though I think it should work fine). Yes, it is technicaly OK > The downside of this that the code will be non-symmetrical, for > alloc_rdma_netdev vs. free_rdma_netdev. Not sure this really matters.. Obviously the way it is now is hard to use since this mistake was made. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
