RE: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jason,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:42 PM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bart Van Assche
> <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>; leon@xxxxxxxxxx; dledford@xxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Idan Burstein <idanb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement
> 
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:32:30PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> > There can be cases in deployment where responder has support for
> > receiving out-of-order, but requester doesn't.  Read responses
> 
> You still haven't explained at all what the transmitter side does differently..

Let's say
Read-1
Read-2 are issued by requester.

For some reason read response for each read arrived via different path to requester,
If ooo is enabled on a QP they will be processed correctly. Else read responses for 2nd read could be dropped.
Here transmitter of read responder is different when ooo is enabled.

> 
> Is this actually some kind of selective retransmit scheme?
> 
> Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux