> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:58 PM > To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Hefty, Sean' > <sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Dalessandro, Dennis' > <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Leon Romanovsky' <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; > 'Doug Ledford' <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Idan > Burstein <idanb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:53:55PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > I will add following more details to Documentation. > > 1. Mention about pcie relax ordering - Barts point 2. Include > > responder side table like Table 79 to crisply describe all cases and > > ordering with respect to send and other messages 3. Also indicate that > C9-28 is relaxed when ooo is enabled on a QP as a description to new > responder side table. > > This was offline comment that I received. > > 4. Provide examples that Steve and Jason highlighted, with multiple writes > to same memory location. > > 5. Reiterate table 79, to make it clear that what doesn't change, or > changes. > > Let me know if you want to see any more details. > > Explain why this needs to be negotiated and what it does to the transmit > side of a QP. > Sure. I will add this. This is important point. > Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
