RE: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:58 PM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Hefty, Sean'
> <sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Dalessandro, Dennis'
> <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Leon Romanovsky' <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> 'Doug Ledford' <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Idan
> Burstein <idanb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement
> 
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:53:55PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > I will add following more details to Documentation.
> > 1. Mention about pcie relax ordering - Barts point 2. Include
> > responder side table like Table 79 to crisply describe all cases and
> > ordering with respect to send and other messages 3. Also indicate that
> C9-28 is relaxed when ooo is enabled on a QP as a description to new
> responder side table.
> > This was offline comment that I received.
> > 4. Provide examples that Steve and Jason highlighted, with multiple writes
> to same memory location.
> > 5. Reiterate table 79, to make it clear that what doesn't change, or
> changes.
> > Let me know if you want to see any more details.
> 
> Explain why this needs to be negotiated and what it does to the transmit
> side of a QP.
> 
Sure. I will add this. This is important point.

> Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux