> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 11:44 AM > To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>; leon@xxxxxxxxxx; > dledford@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Idan Burstein > <idanb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:42:27PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > I would suggest at least using the inverted sense like Bart > > > describes in the kernel - every kernel ULP is safe. > > > I don't see a need to use inverted sense in code. I can surely make > documentation more descriptive as Bart suggested. > > If this is 'better' then it should be on as much as possible, and I certianly > don't want to see kernel ULPs query caps and other pointless things when > they already, necessarily, deal with out of order. Sure. Kernel ULPs and any other user ULPs can skip query caps. > > Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
