On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 07:14 +0530, Shyam Saini wrote: > Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form > AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the > values > of PF_INET and AF_INET are the same. > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > > //</smpl> > @@ > struct sockaddr_in sip; > @@ > > ( > sip.sin_family == > - PF_INET > + AF_INET > | > sip.sin_family != > - PF_INET > + AF_INET > | > sip.sin_family = > - PF_INET > + AF_INET > ) > //</smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
