Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values
of PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
//</smpl>
@@
struct sockaddr_in sip;
@@
(
sip.sin_family ==
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family !=
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family =
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
)
//</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
index f1510cc..9749c52 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
@@ -2516,18 +2516,18 @@ static int pass_accept_req(struct c4iw_dev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct sockaddr_in *sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)
&child_ep->com.local_addr;
- sin->sin_family = PF_INET;
+ sin->sin_family = AF_INET;
sin->sin_port = local_port;
sin->sin_addr.s_addr = *(__be32 *)local_ip;
sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)&child_ep->com.local_addr;
- sin->sin_family = PF_INET;
+ sin->sin_family = AF_INET;
sin->sin_port = ((struct sockaddr_in *)
&parent_ep->com.local_addr)->sin_port;
sin->sin_addr.s_addr = *(__be32 *)local_ip;
sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)&child_ep->com.remote_addr;
- sin->sin_family = PF_INET;
+ sin->sin_family = AF_INET;
sin->sin_port = peer_port;
sin->sin_addr.s_addr = *(__be32 *)peer_ip;
} else {
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
