On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:32:38PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > I think we're fine now. The non-verbs HFSI interfaces aren't really a > > fit for our inifiband/rdma (it should really be called ibverbs I guess) > > interface. > > Out of curiosity, can you point me to the discussions where you > expressed your objections while hfi1 was added to drivers/inifiniband? No idea what you mean. I'm fine with HFI living in drivers/infiniband, although other places for it might not be wrong either. I'm not fine with HFI exposing the non-verbs interfaces through drivers/infiniband/core interface, which as far as I can tell it currently does not even do, although some discussions here suggest that a future interface should cater to those interface. The real mistake was adding usnic, which has not business in drivers/infiniband/ at all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
