On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:31:22PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > Sure. I just want to remind HFI folks to give their comments. There > has been no response from them to Matan's question. > > I am agreement with your point that most RDMA objects will have common > structure at the start and thats sufficient for cgroup to function > correctly. There hasn't been any disagreement yet on it. > So I am believing that we are good for now. Or I am missing something? > I will continue to have mailing list as one point for review and > discussion/feedback. I think we're fine now. The non-verbs HFSI interfaces aren't really a fit for our inifiband/rdma (it should really be called ibverbs I guess) interface. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html