On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:04:18AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:31:22PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > > Sure. I just want to remind HFI folks to give their comments. There > > has been no response from them to Matan's question. > > > > I am agreement with your point that most RDMA objects will have common > > structure at the start and thats sufficient for cgroup to function > > correctly. There hasn't been any disagreement yet on it. > > So I am believing that we are good for now. Or I am missing something? > > I will continue to have mailing list as one point for review and > > discussion/feedback. > > I think we're fine now. The non-verbs HFSI interfaces aren't really a > fit for our inifiband/rdma (it should really be called ibverbs I guess) > interface. Out of curiosity, can you point me to the discussions where you expressed your objections while hfi1 was added to drivers/inifiniband? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
