On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:18:02AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > I think that having a maintainer per provider makes perfect sense > and as long as you Jason (or anyone else) are committed to merging it > all together and produce standard releases we are pretty much set. > > What I think it missing is a release schedule, stable fixes > methodology and merge cycles. I think once we can agree on that > a lot of the concerns will be addressed. So let's keep the maintainers as-is, e.g. each previous project keepts it's own maintainer similar to driver maintainers in the kernel. We'll add Jason as a global maintainer for the build system or any non-controverial fixes and we should be much better setup than the current situation. Combine that with kernel-like major releases plus minor release on demand and we should have a winning setup. Now we just need to bikeshed on a good name for the repo, because honestly rdma-plumbing sucks as a name :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
