On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 07:36:03PM +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote: > > On 05/18/2016 02:28 PM, Mark Bloch wrote: > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledford@xxxxxxxxxx] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:59 PM > > >> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Mark Bloch <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; leon@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > >> rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address > > >> resolution module into core > > >> > > >> On 05/18/2016 01:15 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:51:02AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > >>>> moves it into the ib_core and also keep the new ib_netlink stuff in > > >>>> ib_core. So, fewer modules, not more. > > >>> > > >>> What about getting rid of ib_sa as well so we can avoid that dynamic > > >>> netlink registration patch too? > > >> > > >> That's fine too. > > > Integrating ib_sa into ib_core also means to do the same for ib_mad. > > > If you agree with it (ib_sa & ib_mad becoming part of ib_core), I'll create > > the patches. > > > > Ira, Hal? > > > > I don't see a problem with that. Doug, Will it be acceptable to you if Mark base his patches on this assumption? Thanks. > > Ira >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
