> -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledford@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:17 PM > To: Mark Bloch <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; leon@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address > resolution module into core > [snip] > Unless you went back to your original first patch set where ib_netlink > was a separate module, then the load order could be ib_netlink -> > ib_addr -> ib_core and things would work. Possibly. Depends on whether > the ib_netlink module has anything in it that references symbols in ib_core. Yes, the first version did just that and worked, but then there were comments that we have too many modules and I shouldn't add another one. V0 adds a new kernel module (ib_netlink.ko ) but leaves ib_core and ib_addr modules unchanged. I also have a version with Leon's patch that eliminates ib_addr.ko and doesn't add a new module. Would you like me to submit a new version (with Leon's patch) or the review can continue with V0? > -- > Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> > GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD > Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
