On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/17/2016 10:48 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Nice catch there Bart. That was well before my role as maintainer and >>> so settles things well enough for me. IOW, I don't feel I need to worry >>> about trying to maintain the dual license nature of the RDMA stack as it >>> was broken long before I took over. Thanks for pointing that out. >>> >> >> Does it mean we can submit new code files under GPL only license? > > You always could. > >> I submitted RDMA cgroup related code in ib_core under GPLv2 only license. > > You did and you didn't. For instance, in patch 1/3, the new > cgroup_rdma.c file has a notice of GPLv2, but no notice of copyright, so > it's incomplete. You need to put a copyright notice in the file too. > And in the file cgroup_rdma.h you have neither a copyright notice or a > license statement. It's a plain file. > > In patch 2/3, the file infiniband/core/cgroup.c has a copied dual > license (not necessary, it can be GPL only), but again, it is missing > the copyright notice. > ok. I will fix this part too in v11. > You need to finish the conversation you and Christoph were having in > that thread, but you also need a v11 of the patchset that fixes the > copyright issues. > Yes. I will ping Christoph and Tejun as I am waiting for their responses. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
