> -----Original Message----- > From: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 12:01 PM > To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>; Keller, Jacob E > <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Nelson, Shannon <shannon.nelson@xxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky > <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski > <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy > Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Aron Silverton > <aron.silverton@xxxxxxxxxx>; Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>; Daniel > Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>; Christoph > Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Itay Avraham <itayavr@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jiri Pirko > <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Leonid Bloch <lbloch@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Saeed Mahameed > <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sinyuk, Konstantin <konstantin.sinyuk@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Introduce fwctl subystem > > On 3/17/25 1:33 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:09:47AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > > > >> I'd throw my hat in for drivers/core as well, I think it makes the most > >> sense and is the most subsystem neutral name. Hopefully any issue with > >> tooling can be solved relatively easily. > > > > Given Greg's point about core dump files sometimes being in .gitignore > > maybe "shared_core", or something along that path is a better name? > > > > Not seeing the conflict on drivers/core: > > $ find . -name .gitignore | xargs grep core > ./tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/.gitignore:core-pkey > ./tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/.gitignore:test_core > ./tools/testing/selftests/mincore/.gitignore:mincore_selftest > ./arch/mips/crypto/.gitignore:poly1305-core.S > ./arch/arm/crypto/.gitignore:aesbs-core.S > ./arch/arm/crypto/.gitignore:sha256-core.S > ./arch/arm/crypto/.gitignore:sha512-core.S > ./arch/arm/crypto/.gitignore:poly1305-core.S > ./arch/arm64/crypto/.gitignore:sha256-core.S > ./arch/arm64/crypto/.gitignore:sha512-core.S > ./arch/arm64/crypto/.gitignore:poly1305-core.S I would guess its people putting core in their own ignore lists, not necessarily what we commit to the kernel tree. Thanks, Jake
