On 3/13/2025 12:59 PM, Nelson, Shannon wrote: > On 3/13/2025 5:48 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:30:52PM +0100, David Ahern wrote: > > >>> So that means 3 different vendors and 3 different devices looking for a >>> similar auxbus based hierarchy with a core driver not buried within one >>> of the subsystems. >>> >>> I guess at this point we just need to move forward with the proposal and >>> start sending patches. >>> >>> Seems like drivers/core is the consensus for the core driver? >> >> Yes, anything that is not aux_core is fine by me. >> >> drivers/core or drivers/aux. > > Between the two of these I prefer drivers/core - I don't want to see > this tied to aux for the same reasons we don't want it tied to pci or net. > > sln > > I'd throw my hat in for drivers/core as well, I think it makes the most sense and is the most subsystem neutral name. Hopefully any issue with tooling can be solved relatively easily.
