On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 02:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 05:16:08PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > I know this is a topic proposed for the maintainers summit, but given > > > the number of people who seem to have an opinion and be interested in > > > dicussing it, would a session at LPC be a better candidate ? I don't > > > expect the maintainer summit to invite all relevant experts from all > > > subsystems, that would likely overflow the room. > > > > > > The downside of an LPC session is that it could easily turn into a > > > heated stage fight, and there are probably also quite a few arguments > > > that can't really be made in the open :-S > > > > A separate LPC session for a subsystem or set of subsystems to explore > > local passthrough policy makes sense, but that is not the primary > > motivation for also requesting a Maintainer Summit topic slot. The > > primary motivation is discussing the provenance and navigation of > > cross-subsystem NAKs especially in an environment where the lines > > between net, mem, and storage are increasingly blurry at the device > > level. > > Would there be enough space at the maintainers' summit for all the > relevant people to join the discussion ? Who exactly would you consider the "relevant people" here? It's been a wide-ranging conversation/thread :) thanks, greg k-h
