On 3/30/21 3:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:24:26PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote: >> In the original rxe implementation it was intended to use a common >> object to represent MRs and MWs but they are different enough to >> separate these into two objects. >> >> This allows replacing the mem name with mr for MRs which is more >> consistent with the style for the other objects and less likely >> to be confusing. This is a long patch that mostly changes mem to >> mr where it makes sense and adds a new rxe_mw struct. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearson@xxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> v2: >> v1 of this patch included some fields in the new rxe_mw struct >> which were not yet needed. They are removed in v2. >> This patch includes changes needed to address the fact that >> the ib_mw struct is now being allocated in rdma/core. > > Applied to for-next > > I touched it with clang-format first though, lots of little whitespace > issues > > Thanks, > Jason > When you apply to for-next where does it go? Until it shows up somewhere I need to apply the patch but since you changed it I don't know what it ended up as. If I knew which tree contained the patch I could figure it out. Thanks, Bob
