On 4/3/21 10:00 PM, Bob Pearson wrote: > On 3/30/21 3:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:24:26PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote: >>> In the original rxe implementation it was intended to use a common >>> object to represent MRs and MWs but they are different enough to >>> separate these into two objects. >>> >>> This allows replacing the mem name with mr for MRs which is more >>> consistent with the style for the other objects and less likely >>> to be confusing. This is a long patch that mostly changes mem to >>> mr where it makes sense and adds a new rxe_mw struct. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearson@xxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v2: >>> v1 of this patch included some fields in the new rxe_mw struct >>> which were not yet needed. They are removed in v2. >>> This patch includes changes needed to address the fact that >>> the ib_mw struct is now being allocated in rdma/core. >> >> Applied to for-next >> >> I touched it with clang-format first though, lots of little whitespace >> issues >> >> Thanks, >> Jason >> > > When you apply to for-next where does it go? Until it shows up somewhere > I need to apply the patch but since you changed it I don't know what it > ended up as. If I knew which tree contained the patch I could figure it out. > > Thanks, You should see it here: wip/jgg-for-next https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/log/?h=wip/jgg-for-next https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=wip/jgg-for-next&id=364e282c4fe7e24a5f32cd6e93e1056c6a6e3d31 Mark > > Bob >
