On 01/12/11 10:17, tony.chamberlain@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> inet addr:10.1.0.6 P-t-P:10.1.0.6 Mask:255.0.0.0 > >> That doesn't look happy. Why would both the local and remote address be >> equal? (I wouldn't expect a functioning system to allow a configuration >> like that.) > > I thought the same thing, but that is how openvpnas sets up the routes. > As for changing the software so it does not kill all the tunnels, I agree > completely (as I agree they should use two different config files for > routing traffic, one to route everything through VPN and one to route > everything through ethernet) but I have no control over that. I can't > change the software. Ah, the classic overconstrained problem. Good luck. At least the IP routing part of the solution should work. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
