Re: ppp 2.4.4 eap-tls patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 26, James Cameron <james.cameron@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Is there any reason why you couldn't use MatrixSSL?
> > I would hate to see EAP-TLS depend on a niche license.
> MatrixSSL is dual licensed, and last I checked the GPL is quite common
Sorry, I meant "on a niche library", as in "I do not want to add another
dependency without a good reason".

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux for Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux