On Jul 25, James Cameron <james.cameron@xxxxxx> wrote: > You've used OpenSSL, which has a license that is not altogether open, > specifically clause 6 which requires acknowledgement. Is there any > reason why you couldn't use MatrixSSL? I would hate to see EAP-TLS depend on a niche license. I do not think I would enable EAP-TLS in the Debian package in this case since it would require pulling the MatrixSSL package in the base system. If you do not like the advertisement clause in the OpenSSL license there is libgnutls which is LGPL'ed and widely used (and has a sane API...). -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
