On Tuesday, September 28, 2010, Jean Pihet wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 28, 2010, Jean Pihet wrote: > >> Hi, > > > > Hi, > > > >> Here is what I am proposing, in reply to all your comments: > >> > >> 1) rename the events to match Thomas's proposal: > >> power:power_cpu_cstate > >> power:power_cpu_pstate > >> power:power_cpu_sstate > > > > If that sstate thing is going to mean "suspend", then please drop it. > > "Suspend" is not a state, let alone a CPU state. It is a procedure by which > > the (entire) system is put into a sleep state (that is not confined to CPUs). > > Since suspend is tied to the power management of the system, is it ok > to rename it to e.g. power:system_suspend? I think so. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
