On Tuesday, September 28, 2010, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 9/28/2010 2:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 28, 2010, Jean Pihet wrote: > >> Hi, > > Hi, > > > >> Here is what I am proposing, in reply to all your comments: > >> > >> 1) rename the events to match Thomas's proposal: > >> power:power_cpu_cstate > >> power:power_cpu_pstate > >> power:power_cpu_sstate > > If that sstate thing is going to mean "suspend", then please drop it. > > "Suspend" is not a state, let alone a CPU state. It is a procedure by which > > the (entire) system is put into a sleep state (that is not confined to CPUs). > > there are also non-suspend S states, like S0i1 and S0i3 (supported in > the current Intel "Moorestown" platform) > > so it's slightly more complex than "just" suspend :) That's exactly why I used the conditional above. :-) _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
