On 9/28/2010 2:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, September 28, 2010, Jean Pihet wrote: >> Hi, > Hi, > >> Here is what I am proposing, in reply to all your comments: >> >> 1) rename the events to match Thomas's proposal: >> power:power_cpu_cstate >> power:power_cpu_pstate >> power:power_cpu_sstate > If that sstate thing is going to mean "suspend", then please drop it. > "Suspend" is not a state, let alone a CPU state. It is a procedure by which > the (entire) system is put into a sleep state (that is not confined to CPUs). there are also non-suspend S states, like S0i1 and S0i3 (supported in the current Intel "Moorestown" platform) so it's slightly more complex than "just" suspend :) _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
