Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:11:22PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> So far, nobody has refuted these:
>  1) opportunistic suspend needs a good behaved user-space to work properly
>  2) if suspend blockers are enabled in a system, *all* user-space must
> implement them to work correctly

For this note that there's a fairly strong expectation that even in a
phone type environment a sane userspace implementation will involve a
very large portion of userspace just totally ignoring suspend blockers.
This means that while it is true that userspace as a whole must have
support for suspend blockers the changes required are substantially less
invasive than you appear to expecting.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux