Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:28:01PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> 
> The question is why are we adding a user-space API that:
>  1) no user-space beside Android has expresses interest in implementing
>  2) is dubious whether the benefits are worth the pain for non-Android
> user-space
>  3) will become less and less attractive as dynamic PM gets closer to
> the sweet-spot, and then surpass it
>  4) Android can keep in a separate tree until it's clear in the linux
> community that it's useful (if it ever happens)

So, Felipe,

Do you believe you speak for all of LKML?

Are you willing to tell ZDNet and the Slashdot fanboys that it's OK
for Suspend blockers to live in a separate tree, and it's not a case
of OMG!  Google is forking the kernel?

If you could speak out a passionately on those forums as you have
here, that would be great.

						- Ted
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux