On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 08:08:33PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's clearly possible for a pathological Android application to destroy > > the power management policy. But to do that, the author would have to > > explicitly take a wakelock. That's difficult to do by accident. > > The writer can take a wakelock the whole time the application is > running (isn't that the typical case?), because perhaps the author > realizes that way the application works correctly, or he copy-pasted > it from somewhere else. No, that's not the typical case. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
