On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:35:13PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > appropriately; that's not the case. > > 1) Install a bad application that requests PM permissions and is granted those > > In this case you've gained nothing with user-space suspend blockers. It's clearly possible for a pathological Android application to destroy the power management policy. But to do that, the author would have to explicitly take a wakelock. That's difficult to do by accident. The various failure modes that exist in a non-wakelock world can be triggered in a wide variety of ways by accident. A sufficiently reductionist viewpoint will equate the two situations, but in the real world they're clearly different. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
