On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:35:13PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> appropriately; that's not the case. >> >> 1) Install a bad application that requests PM permissions and is granted those >> >> In this case you've gained nothing with user-space suspend blockers. > > It's clearly possible for a pathological Android application to destroy > the power management policy. But to do that, the author would have to > explicitly take a wakelock. That's difficult to do by accident. The writer can take a wakelock the whole time the application is running (isn't that the typical case?), because perhaps the author realizes that way the application works correctly, or he copy-pasted it from somewhere else. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
