On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:33:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > > The two of you are talking at cross purposes. Thomas is referring to > > idle-based suspend and Matthew is talking about forced suspend. > > Yes, and forced suspend to disk is the same as force suspend to disk, > which has both nothing to do with sensible resource management. It doesn't matter. Current forced suspend to RAM is racy with respect to wakeup events and should be fixed. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
