Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote:

> On Thu, 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:23:50PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > A wakeup event is defined as one that wakes the system - if a system 
> > > > can't be woken by a specific event then it's impossible to lose it, 
> > > > since it wasn't a wakeup event to begin with.
> > > 
> > > So where is the problem ?
> > 
> > The problem is that, right now, if a wakeup event is received between 
> > the point where userspace decides to start a suspend and userspace 
> > actually starts a suspend, that event may not abort the suspend.
> 
> The two of you are talking at cross purposes.  Thomas is referring to 
> idle-based suspend and Matthew is talking about forced suspend.

Yes, and forced suspend to disk is the same as force suspend to disk,
which has both nothing to do with sensible resource management.

Thanks,

	tglx
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux