On Thu, 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:23:50PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > A wakeup event is defined as one that wakes the system - if a system > > > can't be woken by a specific event then it's impossible to lose it, > > > since it wasn't a wakeup event to begin with. > > > > So where is the problem ? > > The problem is that, right now, if a wakeup event is received between > the point where userspace decides to start a suspend and userspace > actually starts a suspend, that event may not abort the suspend. The two of you are talking at cross purposes. Thomas is referring to idle-based suspend and Matthew is talking about forced suspend. Or at least, that's how it appears to me. No wonder you can't agree on anything. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
