On Thu, 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > Doesn't help - I may be hit by the signal between the poll() unblocking > > > and me having the opportunity to call sigmask(). > > > > ppoll(). This is all existing solved stuff. > > Isn't that the inverse of what we want? The application should default > to being SIGSTOPpable except in the case of it being in the process of > having a specific event delivered. Would it help to divide the application into two processes, one of which receives events and the other does the drawing? Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
