On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote: >> As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation that it >> would like to share. I have finally gotten around to porting it to >> v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces. It is provided in the following >> messages for your review. I realize that when we first discussed this >> idea, a lot of ideas were presented for enhancing it. Thanks alot for >> your suggestions. I haven't gotten around to implementing any of them. > > .33 is way too old to submit patches against. > > That said, I really really dislike this approach, I would much rather > see it tie in with power aware scheduling. I may have missed this on lkml but are there any on-going community efforts to power aware scheduling? -- Mike > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
