On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote: > As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation that it > would like to share. I have finally gotten around to porting it to > v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces. It is provided in the following > messages for your review. I realize that when we first discussed this > idea, a lot of ideas were presented for enhancing it. Thanks alot for > your suggestions. I haven't gotten around to implementing any of them. .33 is way too old to submit patches against. That said, I really really dislike this approach, I would much rather see it tie in with power aware scheduling. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
