On Monday 28 December 2009, Willi Mann wrote: > > >> I don't know to how to do a reliable benchmark on this problem, espially as > >> the required time probably very much depends on the exact state of the > >> frozen system. Is there any change in 2.6.32 that might cause less memory to > >> be stored on the suspend device, and thus require more random disk access > >> after the restore? > > > > Actaully, yes, there is. > > > > Please try to increase the value in /sys/power/image_size to approximately > > 1/2 of your RAM and report back (the number is in bytes). > > Without changing the image_size, it especially got much better when I > downgraded QT 4.6 to QT 4.5 which does not work well with KDE 4.3 (seems > to cause memleaks). > > However, image_size is already set to your recommended value (well, > approximately): > > # cat /sys/power/image_size > 951431086 > > My RAM size is 2 GB (however, I have intel graohics with shared mem, so > some part is reserved), my swap size is a little bit more than 2 GB. > > I don't know what value image_size was set to when I tried first. > > Note that when I reported the issue first I used Debian kernel 2.6.32-1, > (probably plain 2.6.32), while I'm now using Debian kernel 2.6.32-2 > (according to the changelog 2.6.32.1) So, is it still a problem for you? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
