On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Willi Mann wrote: > Hi! > > It seems to me that kernel 2.6.32 takes much longer to restore the system > into a really responsive state, despite the fact that s2disk seems to finish > much faster. > > I don't know to how to do a reliable benchmark on this problem, espially as > the required time probably very much depends on the exact state of the > frozen system. Is there any change in 2.6.32 that might cause less memory to > be stored on the suspend device, and thus require more random disk access > after the restore? Actaully, yes, there is. Please try to increase the value in /sys/power/image_size to approximately 1/2 of your RAM and report back (the number is in bytes). Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
