Re: kernel 2.6.32 much slower than 2.6.31 on s2disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.32 much slower than 2.6.31 on s2disk
From: Willi Mann <foss-ml@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:31:29 +0100
Followup-to: gmane.linux.power-management.general
References: <hgb0q7$u8a$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/4.3.2

I can no longer reproduce this, there might have been some very large 
process that caused the delay. 

WM

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

References:
- kernel 2.6.32 much slower than 2.6.31 on s2disk
  - From: Willi Mann

Prev by Date: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems)
Next by Date: Re: RFC: A proposal for power capping through forced idle in the Linux Kernel
Previous by thread: kernel 2.6.32 much slower than 2.6.31 on s2disk
Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.32 much slower than 2.6.31 on s2disk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ACPI] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [CPU Freq] [Kernel Newbies] [Fedora Kernel] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux