kernel 2.6.32 much slower than 2.6.31 on s2disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

It seems to me that kernel 2.6.32 takes much longer to restore the system 
into a really responsive state, despite the fact that s2disk seems to finish 
much faster. 

I don't know to how to do a reliable benchmark on this problem, espially as 
the required time probably very much depends on the exact state of the 
frozen system. Is there any change in 2.6.32 that might cause less memory to 
be stored on the suspend device, and thus require more random disk access 
after the restore?

WM

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux