Woodruff, Richard wrote: > "Andi Kleen" <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Are you talking about x86? > > ARM (TI-OMAP) Sorry I was confused because you used the term "C-state" which is normally ACPI (x86/ia64) specific. If someone says C states I assume ACPI and usually x86 by default due to lack of deeper sleep states on most ia64s. > Not sure about the underlying X86 hardware implementation. On x86 the trend is for the hardware/firmware/SMM doing more and more of this on its own, as in deciding by itself how deep it wants to sleep. -Andi _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
