* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > It would have been easier to just use the public interface and > > hard-wire "rtc0". But going directly to the hardware was dirtier, > > and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously shouldn't go upstream > > until it gets done properly". > > Yes, it was "quick and dirty". And I do not think it is going upstream > in this form...? which would be a pity - this thing _almost_ started doing suspend and resume cycles on my testsystems, all by itself :-) Ingo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
